Setting up a limited
partnership can help clients mitigate IHT when passing on
wealth through generations, write Mark Summers and
Lisa-Jane Fawcett of Speechly Bircham.
Mr and Mrs Smith are
in their late 60s and resident and domiciled in the UK. Mr
Smith is in the fortunate position of having £10 million
cash to spare, as he recently retired after selling his
business.
The Smiths’ family home is worth
£1.5 million and their pension income covers their modest
living expenses. Daughter Jane is married with two
children, aged eight and five. Son Bill was recently struck
by love at first sight and married a showgirl while on
holiday in Las Vegas. Youngest child Bob shows some
entrepreneurial flair but as yet his big ideas have not
resulted in much success.
When Mr Smith is mulling over his
plans for his new-found wealth at the club, his friend is
shocked that he has not thought about his inheritance
tax (IHT) liability. The Smiths
quickly arrange a meeting at
our offices.
The tax man taketh
The couple are right
to have asked for advice. For every pound their assets
exceed their combined nil-rate band of £624,000, the tax
man will take 40 pence when they die – which would result
in a tax bill of more than £4.35 million.
First, they should
have suitable wills. Not only does a will serve the crucial
role of directing who should receive their assets when they
are no longer alive, and when, but it also offers a one-off
opportunity to save significant amounts of IHT. In
particular, a properly structured will can pave the way for
taking steps after the first death to save appreciable
amounts of IHT on the family home.
However, more will need to be done
to reduce the tax on the £10 million cash.
Giving gifts
What about lifetime giving? Mr and
Mrs Smith’s family will be pleased to hear that the couple
can give away as much as they like during their lifetimes
without IHT consequences, provided they survive the gifts
by seven years.
However, Jane’s
children are too young to receive large sums of money and
the Smiths pale at the thought of what Bill and Bob might
do with the cash. They also feel that if they are making a
generous gift, they would like some control over how the
money is spent.
Trusts have been a
popular vehicle for passing wealth down the generations
while protecting assets, but Mr Smith’s friend told him
that it is now impossible to make a trust without expensive
tax charges. We explain that changes to the IHT legislation
have made it harder to use trusts, but there are still
opportunities to transfer assets to trust free of
IHT:
-
Property qualifying for
agricultural and business property
relief.
-
Income that is not needed
for normal living expenses, if the gifts are
part of a regular pattern.
-
Gifts of a value up to
the nil-rate band, every seven years.
Mr and Mrs Smith’s
property does not qualify for agricultural or business
property relief. They are capital rich but relatively
income poor, so the surplus income trust is not
appropriate.
They can set up nil-rate band
trusts, but their combined nil-rate band of £624,000
represents only a small proportion of their assets. With
the need to wait for seven years between each transfer to
trust, it would take many years to reduce their estates
significantly. Any excess over the nil-rate band
transferred to trust would be subject to immediate IHT of
20%, and further charges every 10 years and on
distributions.
Families and partners
We advise Mr and Mrs Smith to
consider a family limited partnership (FLP). This estate
planning tool enables gifts to be made down the generations
without an immediate IHT charge, while allowing the donor
to retain a degree of control and protecting assets for the
long term. FLPs have the following features:
-
A limited partnership is
a business structure governed by contract
law.
-
It has at least one
‘general partner’ who is responsible for
managing the FLP on a day-to-day basis. The
general partner has a small capital interest
and a small income entitlement. It has
unlimited liability in respect of claims
against the partnership, but will be a company
so that its liability is in fact limited. This
company will be owned by a trust, of which Mr
and Mrs Smith can be trustees, allowing them to
retain a degree of control over the FLP.
-
There can be any number
of ‘limited partners’ who have limited
liability and do not take part in managing the
FLP, but have the bulk of the economic interest
in the capital and entitlement to income.
Limited partners cannot withdraw capital or
transfer their interests without the general
partner’s consent.
-
An FLP must operate as a
business with a view to profit but, provided
there is active management of the assets, it
can be used to hold a wide range of investments
such as a traditional portfolio or a property
investment company. It cannot be used to hold
assets that the partners will use, such as the
family home or a holiday home.
-
The duration of the FLP
is potentially unlimited.
Tax advantages
The main advantage of the
structure lies in IHT. Mr Smith’s gift of FLP interests to
his family will be treated as a potentially exempt transfer
for IHT purposes, meaning it will be out of his estate
after seven years.
An FLP is transparent
for income tax and capital gains tax purposes so each
partner is taxed on the underlying profits according to
their share.
Mr Smith wants Jane’s
young children to benefit from the FLP. Children can be
members of an FLP provided an adult enters into it on their
behalf. When they reach 18, the children will have to agree
to be members of the FLP. However, it is unlikely that they
will refuse because they would have to forgo Mr Smith’s
gift entirely.
What would happen if
Bob’s marriage to the showgirl sadly came to an end? His
interest in the FLP would probably be counted in the assets
available to him by the English Courts deciding a
settlement. However, the underlying capital is locked into
the FLP and so the showgirl might only be able to access a
proportion of the income rather than the capital
itself.
What if Bill’s
businesses are struggling? The first advantage is that Bill
cannot withdraw his FLP share without the general partner’s
consent, so the capital is protected for the future rather
than being invested in the business.
Second, if it seems that Bill is
wasting his income on his businesses, the general partner
can invest in assets that roll up income so there is no
income to distribute (although this will affect the income
received by the other limited partners). As a last resort,
the FLP deed will provide that bankruptcy disqualifies
partners from their interests. Bill could be expelled from
the FLP without any entitlement to withdraw his share,
keeping the share safe from his creditors.
The devil’s in the
detail
If an English or Scottish law FLP
is used there are regulatory restrictions because it is a
collective investment scheme for financial services
purposes. This means that certain activities of the general
partner in managing the FLP must be delegated to an
operator authorised by the Financial Services Authority
(FSA). An FSA-authorised investment manager should also be
appointed. A bank or investment manager with which the FLP
assets are placed may be able to provide these
services.
FLPs are more public
than trusts, in that they need to be registered at
Companies House, but they do not usually need to file
accounts.
Careful thought needs
to be put into setting up the FLP as the family members’
entitlements must be fixed at the outset; altering them
gives rise to a disposal for capital gains tax.
Although the
establishment and ongoing costs of an FLP are fairly
expensive, the vehicle provides a solution – one that would
not have been attainable through more conventional estate
planning techniques – to Mr and Mrs Smith’s problem of how
to save significant amounts of IHT while giving them peace
of mind that the family’s assets will stay in the
family.
Mark Summers is a partner and
Lisa-Jane Fawcett a solicitor at Speechly Bircham
LLP.
If you need help with your
taxes click below
For your Free
Consultation
Call 0845
6432954
Or Apply
Online